/fascist/ - Surf the Kali Yuga

Fascist and Third Position Discussion

JulayWorld Attention-Hungry Games™ #1

Nominations are now open!

Help Julay.world stay up.

JulayWorld onion service: bhlnasxdkbaoxf4gtpbhavref7l2j3bwooes77hqcacxztkindztzrad.onion

Max message length: 32768

Drag files to upload or
click here to select them

Maximum 5 files / Maximum size: 20.00 MB


(used to delete files and postings)

Questions That Don't Deserve Their Own Threads FashBO##yWPIHb 08/28/2019 (Wed) 22:55:22 ID: 5b336c No.9 [Reply] [Last]
Self-explanatory. If you have a one-liner question won't generate much discussion and isn't related to moderation or requests, post it here.
371 posts and 146 images omitted.
>>2203 Why don't you set up a /buddhism/ bunker here?
>>3891 It's entertaining to see this guy get so many things right, then completely mess it up with idiotic ideas like universal creator, oneness, no free will, great awakening, ego being something bad and similar garbage. What surprises me is that he even recognizes the zero-point emanation (Atman) but assigns it a feminine quality and attributes it to the so called creator (externalization typical for npc's) rather than what it ought to be, himself. Also, black sun does not represent Saturn, it represents Atman (zero). Then he concludes the article by attempting to lead the reader into thinking that kikes somehow rule over him because he is not "awakened" , but yet at the same time, refuse to be "awakened" themselves? Maybe because this "unity" with the (((creator))) would be nothing else but complete self-annihilation and sentencing yourself to a whole new cycle of incarnations, slavery and suffering, ensuring to remain food for the so called elites and entities which they serve? You see, he is your friend and wants to help you give up your ego and reach infinite consciousness, while leaving this world to those pesky Jews :>) He got fed up with you being treated like goyim, and has finally decided to speak out. Just trust the plan. >>3901 That would be an excellent idea, hopefully it would help the detractors 'detach' themselves to the fullest, if you catch my drift. I never understood why they don't simply kill themselves and achieve the desired ego death instantaneously. No need to meditate, recite mantras, or anything else, all it takes is a chair and enough rope.
>>3922 >I never understood why they don't simply kill themselves and achieve the desired ego death instantaneously. No need to meditate, recite mantras, or anything else, all it takes is a chair and enough rope. I don’t understand this meme about Buddhism at all. It must come from a misinterpretation of what the Buddha meant by dukkha and tanha. The Buddha’s basic teachings are redpilled. He identifies a symptom, he identifies the cause of the symptoms and that they can be stopped and then gives the individual a way forward. The Noble Eightfold Path is anything but world-denying, it provides a good framework for life within time in contrast to degenerate hedonism and extreme life denial (as practiced by Jain monks). Even if one does not consider themself a Buddhist there is much good in the teachings that even a non-religious person can benefit from. It’s best combined with the Bushido-pill. Noble Truth = Ārya-satya = “Aryan Truth” Noble Eightfold Path = Āryāstāngika mārga = Aryan Eightfold Path
>>3901 I'll consider it. however, I see being a BO as a commitment. I'd want to consistently invest time and energy into it, and not flake out or get too busy. >>3922 Buddhism is not nihilism. as >>3923 said, it's about the Middle Path between indulgence and asceticism, the Noble Eightfold Path, and living properly so that you may attain enlightenment. suicide in most cases is a selfish act, causing suffering to others, it's a form of violence, and is usually borne out of negative mental states and intentions. all this results in bad karma, risking rebirth in one of the lower realms. an even more fundamental misconception you've made is that death is equivalent to enlightenment, which it's not. death is just another transition in the cycle of samsara, and the act of suicide would almost certainly ensnare you further, not liberate you.
>>3927 Let us know if you make /buddhism/. I’m interested in the topic and would try to contribute where I could. No pressure though, being BO is a lot of work when one truly wants to create a good resource or community.

Open file (54.74 KB 640x713 hitler brown house.jpg)
Rules / Moderation / Request / Meta Blackshirt 08/28/2019 (Wed) 22:34:09 ID: b3b0b3 No.1 [Reply] [Last]
WELCOME TO /FASCIST/, PLEASE READ RULES BEFORE POSTING Our bunkers: https://fatpeople.lol/fascist/index.html (primary) https://neinchan.com/fascist/catalog.html Welcome to the new location of /fascist/ on JulayWorld! /fascist/ is a board for discussion of fascism in its various manifestations and, in a more general sense, third-position ideology (e.g. Strasserism, etc) and positions that fall outside of the /pol/ - /leftypol/ dichotomy. Though this board is centered around the discussion of fascist movements, leaders and ideology, everybody is permitted to post here regardless of political beliefs, as long as they debate in good faith. Non-fascists and opposing beliefs of all kinds are welcome as long as they respect the rules of this board! This thread will also serve as a thread for requests to moderation, banners and general bitching BOARD RULES 1. Global rules apply 2. No spam, no flooding, serial double- / triple-posting in the same thread within a short period of time will result in a short ban 3. No fedposting* 4. No avatarfagging without reason 5. No pornography (non-sexualized nudity permitted) 6. Gore should be spoiled and relevant to the topic if posted 7. No self-advertising outside of specifically designated threads. No Disc.ord shilling, period. 8. Threads with basic questions not conductive to discussion should go in the QTDDTOT >>9

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Edited last time by FashBO on 01/17/2020 (Fri) 11:02:03.
121 posts and 24 images omitted.
>>3778 Thank you. I believe that we share common standards as to what should we be allowed and what should not. And this is what kept the board alive.
>>3714 go back to (((/islam/))) goatfucker
>>3924 That post fit better in context when there was a whore plastering her tits all over this thread
>>3925 Nice tits
>>3925 Why did you save it and repost it again here? >>3932 Agreed

Open file (180.28 KB 251x374 ClipboardImage.png)
Fascist and Third Position Books FashBO##yWPIHb 08/28/2019 (Wed) 22:41:41 ID: 024e41 No.5 [Reply] [Last]
Post good works that you've read and ask for recommendations ITT.

The list below only consists of works that I myself have personally read. If anybody can vouch for any other good works, let me know!

National Socialism (NSDAP):

>Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler
There are many editions of this book, of course. The best are Thomas Dalton’s new translation and of course Stalag. I’ve also read Manheim and didn’t think it was too bad, but it’s a little too wordy and is translated by a Jew
>Zweites Buch by Adolf Hitler
>The Program of the NSDAP by Gottfried Feder
>The Manifesto for the Breaking of Interest Slavery by Gottfried Feder

Black Front / Strasserism:
>German Tomorrow by Dr. Otto Strasser
>Deutschlands Erneuerung by Dr. Otto Strasser (in German only)

Iron Guard / Romanian Fascism:
>For my Legionaries by Corneliu Zelea Codreanu

British Union of Fascists (BUF):
>Fascism: 100 Questions Asked and Answered by Oswald Mosley
>Tomorrow We Live by Oswald Mosley
>My Life by Oswald Mosley
>Fascism v. Jewry by William Joyce
>National Socialism Now by William Joyce
>The Coming Corporate State by A. Raven Thompson

Italian Fascism:
>Origins and Doctrine of Fascism by Giovanni Gentile
>CasaPound Italia platform: http://www.casapounditalia.org/p/who-we-are.html

JSTOR Articles I've read on more obscure groups with little available material in English:
>Ação Integralista Brasileira: Fascism in Brazil, 1932-1938 by Stanley E. Hilton
>Integralism and the Brazilian Catholic Church by Margaret Todaro Williams
>The Chilean Movimiento Nacional Socialista, the German-Chilean Community, and the Third Reich, 1932-1939: Myth and Reality by Marcus Klein
>Nazism in Chile: A Particular Type of Fascism in South America by Jaime Antonio Etchepare and Hamish L. Stewart
>A Case of Non-European Fascism: Chilean National Socialism in the 1930s by Mario Sznajder
>Fascism and Sinarquismo: Popular Nationalisms Against the Mexican Revolution by Albert L. Michaels

Cultured Thug is also a good YouTube channel for overviews of fascist literature:

Helpful Links:
Edited last time by FashBO on 11/01/2019 (Fri) 13:21:03.
92 posts and 75 images omitted.
Stuff I wrote (one of the audio transcripts of the pdfs got deleted off (((YouTube))), can you guess which one
can I request Confucious' works and Legalist philosophy here?
>>2958 so Perennialism is a no no?
>>3374 Here are the Analects of Confucius: http://classics.mit.edu/Confucius/analects.html An article that’s good, but not by him: https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/confucius/
I just read Yukio Mishima’s “Patriotism”, my first taste of his work outside of “Confessions of a Mask”, which while well-written didn’t resonate with me all that much. I really enjoyed this story though, and how all of these mundane events culminated in an extremely bloody and gory seppuku. Mishima glorified it, but he didn’t attempt to downplay the reality of it, the man dies vomiting, spilling guts and spurting blood, and it was written that he felt as if he wound was vomiting entrails as well. The contrast between the soldier and his wife’s calm preparations for death and their final experiences with each other and the climax waa great. I don’t know if I’d have the balls to do something like that. I will have to explore Bushido more. There is a movie too apparently but I don’t if it would compare in the slightest. I’m not going to watch it right away so I can digest this a bit and think about it.

Open file (218.36 KB 496x556 tree spiker.PNG)
Open file (167.55 KB 878x420 pentti linkola war.png)
Open file (581.06 KB 601x357 ClipboardImage.png)
Anti-Tech, Deep Ecology, National Anarchism, Ecofascism Blackshirt 08/30/2019 (Fri) 22:10:40 ID: 4dbb92 No.31 [Reply] [Last]
I think it would be best this time around to merge deep ecology and anti-tech into a single thread since there is so much overlap. Old thread archive: https://web.archive.org/web/20190804033752/https://8ch.net/fascist/res/13412.html CORE READING > The Technological Society by Jacques Ellul > Industrial Society and Its Future by Theodore J. Kaczynski > Anti-Tech Revolution: Why and How? by Theodore J. Kaczynski > Can Life Prevail? by Pentti Linkola > The Collapse of Complex Societies by Joseph A. Tainter OTHER GOOD READS > The Riddle of Amish Culture by Donald Kraybill (gives good insight into why the Amish do what they do and how it helps preserve stable, close knit communities lacking many of the defects of the degenerate secular world). > Ecodefense: A Field Guide to Monkeywrenching by Dave Foreman > The NS Kindred Experiment

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Edited last time by FashBO on 01/11/2020 (Sat) 01:51:50.
183 posts and 106 images omitted.
>>3496 >I’m doing much better now, I’ve got a new job and got rid of the person that was bringing me down. That's good to hear. >Have you been making any changes in your life to limit your use of certain technology though? Not as much as one would hope, but I've been trying to cut down on my usage of computer and phone and replace it with no useful things. A lot of the shit that I do on there is totally aimless. If anything I've been reading more books. Last year I must have knocked a dozen if not more. I've noticed that reading so much has really helped my attention span. When I first started to get back into reading around late 2017 I could barely get through a section without getting bored, now I get into dozens of pages. Fitness-wise it's slower. I have trouble enough getting into a routine so I've been doing it on purpose, slowly increasing the amounts of curls, tricep extensions and situps that I can do. It's no routine but you do notice small changes in your body after doing it sustained. >I haven’t made any changes ito limit technology in my life tbh. While it's important, I wouldn't feel too bad. The most important things right now are at least combating the most harmful aspects of it (complete addiction, aimless browsing) and probably the physical stuff. I'll probably never make a clean break until I go off the grid, but before that I want to have a mastery over my usage of it where I won't feel "withdrawal" when I do it.
Bump, plus some PDFs (mostly from the reading list). I am thinking of taking some time here soon to compile a general anti-tech reading list that would include some of the authors included with my post such as (obviously) Kaczynski, Ellul and Tainter. The first two especially are essential. I'm still reading through Tainter since I just recently got my hands on a physical copy, but so far it is living up to my expectations. I might hold off a bit though since I'd like to take the time to at least have read the books that I recommend. I would like to read Spengler's Man and Technics in particular, and perhaps some of Jünger's work. Though if some anons could vouch for the quality of a given work I would not be opposed to including it. Anyway this is mainly an excuse to bump the thread. Are anons here reading anything interesting right now?
>>3944 More books. I wanted to get these in in one post but the files are so big
ToC: PART I: Lessons from History >Chapter One King Alfred the Great: The Intellectual & Military Achievements of England’s First Political Soldier >Chapter Two Robert Owen: Welsh Radical & Co-operative Power >Chapter Three The Fischer Controversy: Examining the Foundations of the First World War >Chapter Four What Was So Distinctive About the Russian Bolshevik Party?

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

Brazilian Minister of Culture Quotes Goebbels in Announcement Blackshirt 01/17/2020 (Fri) 15:05:01 ID: b07750 No.3681 [Reply] [Last]
INTEGRALIST BRAZIL SOON ANAUÊ >A video in which Brazil's culture minister uses parts of a speech by Joseph Goebbels, Nazi Germany's propaganda boss, has sparked outrage. >Lohengrin by Wagner, Hitler's favourite composer, plays in the background. >In the clip posted on the ministry's Twitter page, Roberto Alvim details an award for "heroic" and "national" art. >Mr Bolsonaro, a former army captain with a conservative social agenda, has frequently accused Brazil's artists and cultural productions including schoolbooks and movies of "left-wing bias". He has not commented. >In the six-minute video detailing the National Arts Awards, Mr Alvim says: "The Brazilian art of the next decade will be heroic and will be national, will be endowed with great capacity for emotional involvement... deeply linked to the urgent aspirations of our people, or else it will be nothing." >Parts of it are identical to a speech quoted in the book Joseph Goebbels A Biography >”The German art of the next decade will be heroic, it will be steely-romantic, it will be factual and completely free of sentimentality, it will be national with great Pathos and committed, or it will be nothing." >In a post on his Facebook page, Mr Alvim said "the left was doing a fallacious remote association" between the two speeches, and that "there was nothing wrong with his sentence". >"The whole speech was based on a nationalistic ideal for the Brazilian art and there was a coincidence with ONE sentence of a speech by Goebbels. I didn't quote him and I'd NEVER do it... But the sentence itself is perfect." >He did not comment on the music that plays in the video. >The Brazilian Israelite Confederation said: "To emulate [Goebbels'] view... is a frightening sign of his vision of culture, which must be combated and contained." SHUT IT DOWN

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

15 posts and 12 images omitted.
>>3728 I didn't analyze it too much, but it seems that the same Israeli shills helped them come into power, forming a pseudo-faction close to Netanyahu and his clan. I can understand that being the case with USA, but making a switch from covert to overt imperialism globally is a rather interesting development. I guess they feel confident enough. Which would explain such draconic censorship, they are painting themselves as a huge target this way. Now you have repressive, authoritarian police states either being ruled by literal kikes or people who are openly, completely submissive to them. It's no longer a "conspiracy theory" but a geopolitical reality. And as much as I'd enjoy watching every normie who helped build it (actively or passively) fully experience the neo-gulag, it's a tragic development for all the decent people out there. >>3733 Any reasonable person would think that way, it's not about "us vs them" mentality, that's kike (and other subhuman npc) logic, but about having enough rational capacity to recognize what's objectively better and seek to preserve it. There is truth in saying that people often don't appreciate what they have until they lose it. Or seeing what they could be if things went differently in this case. Which is why mutts are more likely to fight in this war. I wish people could experience the consequences of their racial choices immediately, rather than that burden being put on their offspring. For example, any SJW would morph into a nigger or shitskin and every mutt would morph into a white man/woman if they prove worthy enough. It happens in the next life anyway, but some instant karma would be nice >>3742 You can theoretically have a white ethnoglobe without killing a single subhuman. Or even without sterilizing them. All it takes is a global white hegemony and removing the kikes from power, completely. Then you could implement a one-child policy for subhumans (or condition aid/gibs with them not reproducing) and make whites have 4-5 children. In several generations, their numbers would become small enough to be integrated without damaging the gene-pool. Fast forward, and you have a white ethnoglobe. Kikes and spiritual semites (which are plentiful) are the only major obstacle to that.
>>3681 He was fired and Bolsonaro hired a cunt "actress" as his replacement, just so he won't be called a "muh woman hater". There is no political solution to anything. Violence is the solution to everything. >>3686 This. >>3731 The thing is, the majority of the masses in Brazil are against him. They are all brainwashed "muh nazism bad" cattle. Only a violent uprising, with mass killings among the zombie masses will enable white nationalist brazilians to fix the country.
>>3939 The majority is never on board to begin with.
>>3947 That is why elimination must precede change. Or be it's starting point. There is no solution without getting rid of the braindead masses first.
>>3949 Civilization itself is built on top of the braindead masses. Everyone has their place in the hierarchy, exceptional and mundane. They have always been and always be.

Why Shouldn’t We Embrace Islam Again? Blackshirt 01/19/2020 (Sun) 15:56:04 ID: 81971a No.3850 [Reply] [Last]
>against (((usury))) >virile warrior ethos which persists to this day >anti-homo and tranny >against pre-marital sex and adultery >anti-Jew >affirms traditional gender roles (patriarchy) >modesty cherished >against alcohol and drugs This is a living, flourishing tradition which is the antithesis of the decadent Jew-controlled matriarchies of today. I think it’s no surprise that 20th century Traditionalists like Frithjof Schuon and Guénon embraced Islam, and today it seems even more sensible to me in opposing the Jew and its system. Christianity is dying and is an instrument of the Jews in destroying Europe, likewise paganism has no community, no real spirit behind it comparable to real religous fervor such as that inspired by “lā ʾilāha ʾillā llāh”. I don’t see why I SHOULDN’T convert, find a white woman, convert her too and have a big traditionalist family with an actual moral anchor. Religion is instrumental in a sense, and is different expressions of one truth among different mentalities and cultures. More and more to me the anti-Islam sentiment seems to me anti-traditional, especially when we overlap so much in beliefs. Maybe I’m wrong, but I have a feeling that this will become more and more frequent as time passes. Thread theme: https://youtu.be/K8zgt6ZKvqk
28 posts and 28 images omitted.
>if you become your enemy you win
Open file (33.75 KB 463x300 Patti-Lateranensi.jpg)
>>3928 Fascism does not need a religion to work. If anything, semitic religions are a constant source of pollution of the strenght of fascism, whose grip on all aspects of society should be complete and stand above everything else. Of course compromises can be made - italian fascism made a political agreement with the Vatican State for example, but as a general rule above all is the State, not religion. Whoever shills for religious bullshit over this is either stupid or malicious. The ones shilling for Islam are the worst stupids of them all.
>>3850 Tolerating the existence of shitskins is out of question. Kill them all.
>>3936 >things that will never happen: the post The only thing that matters is keeping them out of our countries and not allowing them to become dependent on Western aid and technology. This is half the reason why their numbers have increased tenfold since European contact. We were always outnumbered but it is only getting worse. Globalization is ensuring that non-whites will attempt to come to white countries for various economic opportunities as well. Jews of course are well aware of how this can be exploited.
>>3935 >Fascism does not need a religion to work. Atheism has to be discouraged at all costs for what it is, nihilistic and despair-producing. Without some sort of higher purpose (higher than mere service to the state or something materialistic like race), there's no reason why a person should not adapt the classical atheist attitude that was often inscribed on Epicurean graves: >non fui, fui, non sum, non curo "I was not, I was, I am not, I do not care". It's not hard to see how prevalent this attitude is today. At minimum plebs need religion.

Open file (135.26 KB 739x513 siegetards.png)
The accelerationism death cult Blackshirt 09/29/2019 (Sun) 05:17:05 ID: 642b5d No.191 [Reply] [Last]
So after BT went out and did his thing in the place, a big swarm of astroturfers started flooding the site with this retarded ideology. It consists of ampering up the acts of violence so that there can be discomfort in the population which would allow space for a revolution.
The problem is, the ones that integrate this ideology are bonkers-retarded. They would label anyone who is not supportive of their actions a coward that helps the machine, acting reactionary to whatever message they receive. There is no margin to integrate thought to someone's action, there's only calls for violence and ostracizing for denying any of this. And they're not leading by example as well, because if they did, there wouldn't be a need to call others to action and mindlessly shame bystanders for not participating.
How can a group that consists of calling others cowards while waiting for someone to lash out violently survive? There is hate towards modernity, but there is no desire to build from it.
I'd also like to /r/ that image comparing the idea of the swastika and how it has been misrepresented by these people.
154 posts and 33 images omitted.
>>2997 Different kind of accelerationism retard. Right wing accelerationism has it's origins with James Mason, Joseph Tommasi, Robert Jay Matthews, and Alexander Slavros (as well as the wider Iron March community).
>>191 Only jews and leftists fear the uprising in violence. Violence ALWAYS works. You kill your enemy, and you win. >acting reactionary to whatever message they receive Found the subversive communist. There is nothing wrong in being reactionary. In fact, those who aren't reactionary are always on the enemy's side and must be killed along with them.
>>3938 I'm not sure that "reactionary" in that context is referring to the communist usage of the term (i.e. "being a right-winger or supportive of the current and past ways of life")
>>3938 Right? How is it not clear what the narrative is. The cries of "I-I'ts f-fake" and "D-d-d-d-don't shoot your enemy goyim they win!!!" ad nauseum makes me laugh. It's so hilarious when reds/glow/homos try so hard to deradicalize. But especially reds. Stalin himself was a bank robber, muderer and criminal along with his early rag tag gang of scummy good for nothing bandits in 1900's. And while at the same time these neoliberals praise mao's slogan "Revolution comes out of a barrel of a gun" and not even a suspicion is given. [spoilers]Mao wasn't wrong[/spoiler] But the most damning is that the left are allowed to openly praise their killers on reddit/twitter/etc all the time with no problems like glowhomo shills showing up to throw their effeminate hissy fits in attempts to demoralize them. Faggots like OP try their best to ignore the fact that anyone remotely intelligent already know which side the bread is buttered on and just try to consensus crack people taking the Soy "Do nothing Goy" blackpill. I mean who are they fucking kidding. Leftists literally fucking sit there all the time and praise violence, 1917, uprisings, of hanging people without in the open most clearnet monitored social media, killing anyone, and they also carry it out often, while praising each-others actions openly on forums like Reddit like the ice killer and some many others in the past. No bid deal, but only when it's leftist reprobates. I'm dead sure many of their killers had accounts there and were actively praising violent insurrection too, they do it all the time anyway, but no "convenient" info like that is leaked to media or shut down, simply because they are the system's foot soldiers. Like the ICE killer, and killers before but they literally have no problems and they don't seem to get any problems beside what's caused their own stupidity and non-fame because low KR and just senseless soy optics. Only us Anti-ZOG is of interest, and they are completely ignored. Is it not obvious to everyone they 100% ignore leftist trash because they are system's Soros Jews paid gangs? The system doesn't give a fuck about violence, except when it happens to them and their tentacles. It's just so pathetic fags like OP even try to cop-out blame random anonymous persons for 100% independent decisions, the obvious fact that none of us even know each-other rofl. If one of their subhuman pro immigrant genocide soyboy smokes some of their enemies it's no big deal, max 2day to maybe 1 week of media coverage and then utter silence proceed to memory-hole. Meanwhile if people even sympathetic with valid arguments to not getting mega genocided with open borders does anything even remotely close the shoah hand-wringing stories span years to fucking decades with instant ZOG response and draconian tyrant laws. When all the left or the nigger gets response and not the casual "lol oh gee that sucks, these things just happen goy - be more tolerant lol" media responses.
>>3942 Extremely relevant pic to this post. This is honestly one of the worst behaviors present in our own circles - throwing our own under the bus when someone actually does something.

Unpopular Opinions Blackshirt 09/11/2019 (Wed) 15:01:16 ID: 44881c No.87 [Reply] [Last]
Post your unpopular opinions here
>Islam is actually pretty based and Islam minus Africanization would be a net benefit to the West
>there is nothing wrong with having more than one wife
>Tarrant is overrated
>Hitler had no chance of winning, but was still based overall
338 posts and 96 images omitted.
>>3879 >Wrong, culture is dependent on genes. genes certainly influence culture, but in theory, you can be converted to any culture regardless of genes, especially if raised in it from an early age. however, in practice, culture tends to be propagated by direct descent. there are numerous historical examples of peoples retaining certain key qualities through very different environments and circumstances. one of my first red pills was reading Thomas Sowell, specifically Black Rednecks and White Liberals, where he delves into all this. the chapter on slavery educated me quite a bit. >I'd rather be surrounded only by whites whatever their culture or beliefs are (well, provided they are not for importing non-whites at least, that would make the whole thing pointless) than some niggers who (((integrate))) into whatever retarded civnat concept of a "nation" kikes have come up with. I think both ethnicity and culture matter, with culture being most important, and ethnicity being the most important conduit of culture. >Civic nationalism = globalism. there's definitely overlap there. however, I think there's a healthy middle ground between a pure ethnostate vs a civnat state with no sense of community/tradition/history whatsoever. I think Israel serves as an ideal ethnostate for the Jews in spite of its Arab minority. you can maintain your people while allowing limited foreign exchange. as I said, a trickle, not a flood. >If kikes introduce a law that you should hang yourself by the balls, would you do it because it's legal? as I said earlier, not all laws and authorities are legitimate. human law is valid insofar as it's consistent with higher law. >There is no such thing as negative publicity, the man himself said it. They "attack" him so fools like you think he's legitimate. I think Trump presents a real challenge to globalist hegemony, as does Brexit. I doubt the relentless criticism of right-wing populism is all a manufactured puppet show. as I said, Trump is a strategist, his enemies hoped to defeat him with their control of media, only for it to work against them.
Open file (121.49 KB 373x1920 Amerimutt 2.jpg)
>>3884 >but in theory Humanism and other kike garbage not based in scientific reality. You can dress a dog into a suit and teach it to bark a few words, that doesn't make it human. Other races can only emulate the culture (and fail miserably at it, as we have seen all over the world) Besides, cultural imperialism destroys autochthonous nations, regardless of race. Initially those who are subjugated by it, but ultimately, the one making the core population of the empire. As we have witnessed with literally every empire in modern history. When your "nation" is based on arbitrary, Talmudic concepts like universalist religion, inorganic culture, (((humanist/liberal values))) etc, it ceases to exist, because those things lack fundamental reality. Nations can only be organic, or hybrid. Americans can be a hybrid nation (and by hybrid I mean a generic "white" nation that's a mix of various genetically and culturally compatible European nations), they just need to come to their senses, which is the difficult part. It was envisioned as such country in the first place. >and ethnicity being the most important conduit of culture That's not how nature and reality work, I'm beginning to think that you are just trolling. Alternatively, the product of your current "culture" is not very pretty. >I think Israel serves as an ideal ethnostate for the Jews Jews are not a real nation, and they are getting outbred by Arabs and mixed with Slavs which they keep importing >insofar as it's consistent with higher law. And what higher law might that be? >I think Trump presents a real challenge to globalist hegemony You can have globalism without open borders. We can all pretend to be living in real nations while we get flooded with subhumans and ruled with (((international elements))), protecting our arbitrary borders and "cultures" from the other fake countries. You can be the team red, and I will be the team blue. And my niggers would be better than yours, because they were born on MY side of the border. Goebbels was right, culture over there is seen as commodity and the concept of identity is absolutely absurd.
>>3885 >Humanism and other kike garbage not based in scientific reality. I agree that there are differences between the races, mental and physical. but I'm sure you've heard of minorities becoming 'whitewashed', or european travellers 'going native'. this suggests that cultural diffusion can be horizontal as well as vertical. ethnic differences present a barrier, but not one that's impenetrable. in spite of our differences, we are all homo sapiens, and we're all capable of breeding with each other and having fertile offspring. we have both similarities and differences. it's comparable to dog breeds, which can be very different in build, temperament, and capability, but ultimately, all are canis lupus familiaris. likewise, different peoples can have very different qualities, while still sharing a baseline humanity. I agree that nations must have shared tradition/history/culture/blood in order to be viable. however, you can have some degree of exchange and resident minorities, as long as its within limits. Japan may be a better example -- they allow foreign visitors and residents, within limits, but that nation is still thoroughly Japanese in language, culture, and ethnicity, as it should be. >Jews are not a real nation, and they are getting outbred by Arabs and mixed with Slavs which they keep importing I think Jews understand the importance of tradition and blood, even while they deny it to others, which is why they maintain an ethnostate in spite of pushing for open borders elsewhere. Israel is mostly Jewish, and this is upheld by its laws and institutions. >Alternatively, the product of your current "culture" is not very pretty. this has everything to do with globalism, the talmud, and marxism. >And what higher law might that be? it's alot to get into, but if you study political philosophy, there is a concept of universal law, which cannot be abrogated by humans, and our own laws are only valid when consistent with the higher good. you'll find this in Greek & Roman thought, especially Cicero; it's also known as Dharma in the east. >You can have globalism without open borders. We can all pretend to be living in real nations while we get flooded with subhumans and ruled with (((international elements))), protecting our arbitrary borders and "cultures" from the other fake countries. if borders aren't enforced, they may as well not exist. if countries are being inundated by 3rd world migrants, then this is equivalent to open borders, regardless of de jure status.

Message too long. Click here to view full text.

>>87 >literal redditor meme >muh shitskin religion

Open file (107.73 KB 520x402 13932477_f520.jpg)
Political Tribalism Blackshirt 01/20/2020 (Mon) 21:07:49 No.3909 [Reply] [Last]
I have been reading Against Democracy by Jason Brennan. I feel directly attacked and called out by this book. Jason calls out those who inform themselves exclusively to reinforce their own opinions and get better at arguing. Which is exactly what I do while reading his book: I have doubts against democracy, so I read "Against Democracy" to confirm those doubts, and get better at arguing against democracy. How would you get over this mindset? Even if I were to go read the "enemy's" literature, I feel like I would be doing it only to find points of their thoughts to attack. I'm also ashamed to admit that, because of my ignorance compared to the author, I'd be afraid of getting swayed with believable falsehoods and half-truths. I do not have such fears when reading material written by my side.
>How would you get over this mindset? By embracing Fascism which goes with a "what works" system rather than a "one size fits all" dogma. Pretty easy mate.
>>3909 I don't see what's so bad about this mindset if I'm understanding it correctly, honestly. I enter books with both a hope to understand what they believe and to learn how to better argue against them. I'm not dogmatically attached to fascism, but the more I read whether it's sympathetic literature, hostile literature or anything else has only strengthened my views through no conscious desire of my own to become "more fascist". You've gotta be skeptical of everything you read though. It may sound weird but I'm even more skeptical with facts and assertions when reading stuff by /ourguys/
>>3909 >How would you get over this mindset This mindset is not explicitly wrong, whatsoever. Anyway you can't legitimately make a good argument against for something unless you have read it with objectivity first and thought it over. Why do you entertain the notion that "being afraid to pick a side is legitimate", in the first place? Your doubts are what exactly? Us vs Them is no new idea and has always existed since the dawn of mankind, there is nothing wrong with it either. And as long as humans exist, to a degree there will always be opposing sides in the first place. It's always good to be critical but at some point you're just going to have to go with what's true vs what's not, we've heard 6million fake stories from them already, so what is the problem? Our ideology has its roots in factuality, not feelings which pundits like leftists/marxists do not. That's why they are forced to take below belt scummy actions like shilling, mass censoring the internet, taking over academia, goverments, with their people and generally subverting people with their propaganda 24/7, on the other hand if they were right, if they were actually correct there would be no reason for their strategies of brute forcing people to agree with their deceptive crazy narratives literally requiring constant brain washing to barely even reach mediocre functionality, because what the people in charge believe is, malevolent and deadborn. >>3910 Exactly
Open file (164.08 KB 724x960 5000km in 24hrs.jpg)
>>3909 >How would you get over this mindset? tl;dr: Ride the Tiger, brah Alternatively Fascism goes against modernity –More specifically, the Spirit of Modernity– one of the manny aspects of this Modern World is democracy, specifically the great deal of mental and spiritual consequences spawn from it, one of these –as I suppose the book covered– is the creation of an « Us-vs-Them » mentality. This division is the reason Fascism goes against democracy, or in other and less extreme cases it specifically seeks to end this division by changing the role of democracy in society –As, similar to capital or technology the problem is not the object itself, but its misuse–. However there is another consequence to democracy that is just as prevalent but more elusive. In a society which holds total participation in all sorts of decisions as a core aspect the idea that one must have an opinion on everything, that you must choose a side, that you are obligated to participate in the « Us-vs-Them » dichotomy is certain to arise. This causes all discussions to turn into combat, not only are people obligated to pick a side, sides are also expected to fight against one-another unless one wants to risks to appear ignorant, uninterested, unpatriotic, traitorous and all slander that could derive from it. Buddhists hold Believes on a similar regard as material possessions, one must learn to be able to let go of our believes as easily as we should for material possessions. A practice I have seen among these cultures is for one to declare your believes only to have someone try to disprove it, and you are expected not to react. It is important for me to comment that this is not an expression of passiveness, that truth is impossible to acquire, nor teaching us that we are wrong in everything, but to take away the fear of being wrong, something which the simple thought of is enough to discourage manny. Once you have overcome this fear you will be at peace with your ideas, if you are right then good, but if you are wrong you will not be disturbed and change your views without hesitation. You can believe, you can defend your ideas, you can call others wrong, you can make assumptions based on those ideas, you can genocide entire races over those ideas, the truth is absolute and there are ideas that come closer to it than others, there is such a thing as right and wrong; but if you are ever convinced wrong then just leave it. Ideas maybe part of our identity, but just as no one would want to base their identity over bad habits we want to get rid of; you should have no problem in breaking away from wrong ideas. Now, Acting on your believes while recognizing that you are limited in your information-gathering means that the responsable thing to do is to take great care on what you learn. This contrasts greatly with the stiff and educated leftist thought, who pride themselves over what they know and are capable of letting millions die, cut ties with one-another and ultimately fail over ideological purity; When you pride over your limited ideas –and due to our mundane existence they will always be limited– you are bound to make an enemy out of reality, and reality has no care for your believes, only herself. Back on the Old Board I said « Reality is where meme-Ideologies go to die » as a way to explain why manny people obsessed over politics only do theory and never try to put their ideas in practice, but now because of your question I found a new side to that phenomenon. And when reading books do not approach them as a way to acquire knowledge, but to engage in a conversation with the author, it is a much less combatant approach so you should feel less the need to be defensive, you are not being taught something, you are being told the ideas of someone else. Of course, an unconscious need for validation may also make you insecure over your ideas matching the Autor's or just be on the side of people you hold in high-regard, but I do not want to expand on that because I do not want to sound accusatory. I have said manny times that I find books a bit overrated, I think that I should clear a few things, specially now that it is relevant to an Anon's Question. Books are not a shortcut for experience, you should not seek information from books first, true wisdom comes from experience and self-introspection, because it is our experiences and ideas that make us; to analyze ourselves it is to analyze our ideas. And there is no time for introspection if you are constantly filling your mind with the noise from other people. I am not telling you not to listen others attentively, not even individuals you disagree with, but to be aware that these are the experiences of other people, and cannot make them part of your identity without making them yours first, simply agreeing is not enough, you must know how they all relate to your own experiences and fully integrate them, when brought up they should not be longer a « According to this autor, X happens » but a simple « X », these ideas should become such an obvious part of reality that no one could realistically claim ownership of them.

Theology/Philosophy Thread Blackshirt 10/30/2019 (Wed) 08:12:47 ID: c62175 No.750 [Reply] [Last]
I know we have a thread for the Gita but I figure one serving for any and all worthwhile theology/philosophy would do.

I'll begin the thread by linking a book by one Edward Feser:


Feser's a Catholic, but as far far they go he's rather able. He's overall something of a babbies' first conservative, but I suspect that it stems from not wanting to lose "Respectability.' Regardless his work is one of others worth a read for a movement.
21 posts and 10 images omitted.
Open file (753.17 KB 558x1275 911.png)
>>750 why are (((they))) always trying to hide in plain sight? why do (((they))) hide their symbols everywhere? are (((they))) trying to reduce the amount of bad karma they gain, or are they trying to make their symbols or "spells" more powerful? This video is pretty christpilled, but I think it a good example of this: https://invidio.us/watch?v=18N-PIIxxO0&list=PLjiPOC8yurztBYM0-TVcE1Gn0hP89joc8&t=10s also, what do you think about these posts made by ""elite insiders""? I can't decide whether these are true or bs. https://archive.org/stream/TheRevelationsOfAnEliteFamilyInsider2005/TheRevelationsOfAnEliteFamilyInsider2005_djvu.txt https://ia802300.us.archive.org/8/items/rofschildv1/IAmARofschildAxeMeAQuestion.html
>>3840 The sick human trash are fixated on shit like spirit cooking, curses, occult magic, symbolism and pedophilia, literally no subhuman vice or degenerate behavior escapes them. What do you expect? They love to brag obviously because they are a collection of mentally ill socio/psychopathic/schizoid criminals, it's the exact same behavior as arsonists and other lunatic freaks like to show up crime scenes. It's simply a sick power display, it is psychologically pleasing to them to see the chaos and trophy over they have created. It's a demonstration to the witnesses and the onlookers of their power, so that they can stand there and watch while people may investigate their crime, and they rejoice in the idea of "I did this, and there's nothing anyone especially the filthy goyim/plebs can do about it."
I believe that Jesus was a sage who had learned the truth(s) and how to elevate himself a la gnosticism. Jesus' teachings are recorded in the New Testament but, as we know, the bible was compiled at a much later time: I believe that (((they))) have tried to delete (even entire books) and alter as much as they can, however, I believe that the truth (well, at least a part of it) has been preserved in the Bible, as is the case with most other religions Excluding the (((new age))) stuff that's designed distract and to only hinder one's spiritual evolution. The texts of the New Testament warn time and time again about (((Pharisees))) and their lies and how (((they))) follow corrupted doctrine. Finally, I believe that the Truth(s) have been preserved to greater extent in The Nag Hammadi Library than in the Bible. http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl.html
Also, I found these texts interesting, but I haven't fully read them yet "The Book of the Giants": https://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/giants/giants.htm "The Gospel of Thomas": https://www.sacred-texts.com/chr/thomas.htm (See also: http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/nhl_thomas.htm) "The Epic of Gilgamish" or "The Epic of Gilgamesh": https://www.sacred-texts.com/ane/eog/index.htm https://www.sacred-texts.com has a large collection of various texts, and we have a thread that has links to various books >>>/fascist/3839


Captcha (required for reports and bans by board staff)

no cookies?