>>2170>I’m not going to try to start a x isn’t white, or D&C derailment
There is a world of difference between appreciating European diversity and that. It's also better to be reasonable and realistic than fall for national chauvinism (Which was always promoted by kikes and strongly opposed by Hitler, as it always led to their benefit and our downfall. Every bloody brother war led to gradual advancement of their Talmudic plans like globohomo). For example, I'm a Balkanigger and I have no problems seeing Germanics as superior in many regards, but inferior in some. And yes, the worst European is still likely to be better than best non-European (with some exceptions like certain Asians or occasional "whiter" mixed people). I'm for a two-track eugenic approach, one would try to purify European nations racially and culturally (preferably to pre-Christian times) to be as close to their roots as possible (tradition), another would be something like USA but (mostly) without non-whites and without kike poz (which would take a tremendous amount of work to accomplish) It's the latter where all the generic white people (who have mostly European ancestry, but are too mixed to fall under any root nation or do not wish to) live. It would focus on creativity and trying out new things for the future. The two combined, rooted strongly in tradition, rising high in creation, would produce the best fruit.>In my view race is more of a gradient
I agree, however at a certain point it becomes like a tree, with some branches being on the same level, but different, and others descending downwards (or falling off)>Unless you mean nation as a shared culture, history, languages, ethnic group, and vague areas rather than physical definable land with strong borders
Precisely. You would get something like a Germanic, Celtic, Slavic, Dinaric/Mediterranean federation, then independent nation states (like Netherlands), then autonomous regions (Flemish). Right for self-determination and a broader sense of unity should both be maintained. However, borders would be strongest at the federation/commonwealth level, then become gradually weaker.>Is that the actual theory?
Yes, look it up. Superior species tend to be more monogamous and produce less, but higher investment offspring, while the inferior ones tend to breed as much as possible with as many partners as possible, utilizing a spray and pray strategy. Which is pretty much consistent with metaphysics. like the rest of my post.
Of course, it was not taken to it's logical conclusion out of fears that it might not be very PC, but one can easily extrapolate it as such. Racial science theories (that are banned and memoryholed hard today) were reaching very similar conclusions.>yet they still get special treatment for it despite their ancestors suffering
They are being degenerated by such treatment. It's stopping them evolve and grow in a natural way. There is no fast-tracking in nature, that's a deranged Jewish fantasy. I saw a nigger in Africa climb a tall palm tree like a monkey to grab the coconut, how many of them in USA could do the same? They are still living in an alien culture where they need to depend on babysitting in order to survive. A tree without roots cannot live for long, except in entirely artificial environments like ZOG.