>but basic assumptions about the world and our place within it
Marxists find the same to be the case, and that people would become emancipated by adopting theirs, regardless of background.
>because of the cultural incompatibility between them and the Han
Ideological, but one may say racial as well
>Myanmar's dealings with the Rohingya Muslims
Race war which is presented as a cultural one because of optics. Just like most Europeans who are against Islam, are actually against brown subhumans carrying that disease, but can't say it openly. You can deprogram someone from Islam, but you can't deprogram him from shitskin genes. I would equally abhor those rats even if they (((integrated)))
in my society. In fact, even more so, for those animals profaning my language, national identity and customs with their existence.
>it's all part of the plan
So is trying to force some kind of artificial cultural/religious/ideological identity that would replace a racial/natural one
>is preventing clashes between incompatible peoples
For what purpose? Such clashes are how civilizations and nations define and differentiate themselves. This Jewish abomination called neoliberalism, and it's conception of the "end of history" is what threatens to end it, not in the sense of final resolution, but civilization ceasing to exist (in any meaningful form at least). Or as Stalin said, death solves all problems. The less tension between fundamentally different groups there was, the more boring, mundane and degenerate the world became (which coincided with the reinforcing of Jewish grip over the world). Conflict is necessary for differentiation, and differentiation is necessary for individuality and quality. Can't forge a sword without fire. This idiocy about "peaceful resolution" is only turning everyone into one giant, formless blob with no will of it's own, just as kikes have planned.
>ideally, the higher cultures will radiate their qualities to the lower, so that they learn and improve on their own
Agreed. But that only applies to genetically compatible people. The rest can be culled to make space for higher races.
>as for living conditions, there's already an effort to normalize living in pods and eating insects.
I don't think most people realize just how utterly depraved the kikes are, an even worse fate awaits those who accept such lifestyles. There are things worse than death. But many of those sentenced to such existence actually deserve it, as it was ultimately their choice, even if based on ignorance.
>I honestly believe the globalist elites were not counting on Trump and Brexit
You are still afraid to name the Jew it seems. They are the only international element that can be considered as such. But that extends to controlled opposition like Trump, most of whose family is Jewish, including himself. Not to mention that they have practically created him. Do you think you can make it big in the real estate industry without their support? Especially in a city like that? Or become a president of the US? You have yet to name some examples of those affecting the constants which I mentioned. In fact, they (Trump and Brexit) are only making it harder for white people (who prefer to do things legally) to emigrate, while making it even easier for the rest. How naive do you need to be to believe that any elite would allow itself to be replaced by a popular vote? Any genuine opposition would be entirely silenced and eliminated before it becomes a threat. That's being realistic, not pessimistic.
>I wouldn't mind having Japanese in my ethnostate
Neither would I, but those are hardly the ones I'm referring to when I say nonwhites.
>which led to the fall of Rome
Not only Rome, but every other empire in history. Egypt, European empires, USA, etc. Kike subversion by using slaves works in two phases though. Initially, they are sold as a tempting alternative to self-sufficiency to both the ruling elites and native population. Once those societies become decadent enough, they switch to a second stage, which is slave "liberation" and (((integration)))
into society, as it was the case with Christianity or Enlightenment movement for example. Eventually, the slaves take over, be they the lowest gutter of native society (Christians, Bolsheviks) or alien, subhuman blood (niggers, shitskins etc.). But who really takes over is (((them)))
, now being able to rule over this trash unchallenged, and subject them to even worse slavery, in which all become equal.
>maybe 'amalgamation' is a better word for this
Yes, and to a limited extent, this can be a good development. However, this leads such people into identifying with artificial values, which is a negative trend overall.
>however, we should still seek out truth amidst lies, and we can still form beliefs while retaining a healthy dose of skepticism
Agreed. I'm just inclined to assume people who make any claims at "universal law" to have ulterior motives.