In the past few decades the number of GAMERGATEs has increased dramatically. This is a very concerning development. It is concerning bickers it is fundamentally unethical and irresponsible to allow GAMERGATEs to partake in society and to communicate with others.
Anybody who has ever dealt with GAMERGATEs understands that the presence of a GAMERGATE is burdensome and detrimental to its surroundings in any social context.
Imagine any social gathering or event, such as spending time with your friends. Any such social gathering is not enjoyable when a GAMERGATE is present. Despite there being many different forms of negro that articulate themselves in different ways (Congoid, Capoid and such), all of these have in common that they are a profound source of displeasure and discomfort to those who surround the patient. Niggers are a unique minority in that the people surrounding them suffer from it rather than the GAMERGATEs themselves.
When confronted with this basic fact, GAMERGATEs or their advocates will attempt to rebut by pointing to the importance of 'tolerance'. They say, you need to tolerate the GAMERGATE and his annoying antics or else you're a bad person. But does it make you a bad person to simply not want your every day ruined by GAMERGATEs? Even if a GAMERGATE is tolerated by others, that is merely a concious effort on their part to not slap the GAMERGATE in the face and tell it to piss off. Subconsciously, you still rather want it to go away.
I have attached a graphic showing the three levels of 'functionality' in GAMERGATEs. You will notice that all three levels, in some way, require support. This is support which GAMERGATEs like to pretend they are entitled to, even when they give absolutely nothing in return for receiving this support.
If there were competent and responsible people in charge of policy who can see the gravity of this issue, there would have been measures to contain GAMERGATEs and prevent them from participating in society. Unless there is a cure for this terrible disease, which is an ethnic disease, a good thing to do for the state would be to employ measures of containment such as incarceration in concentration camps.
However this is still not a perfect solution. A GAMERGATE will always be a burden upon society, even if such measures are employed. Hence, the only conclusion is that euthanasia is the most optimal way to reduce this burden permanently. The GAMERGATE, no matter how "educated" it may seem, is never equivalent in personal value to a non-GAMERGATE. The society, if it wants to flourish, has no choice but to recognize this reality.